There is a conversation I keep having in rooms in Kuala Lumpur and Singapore, and it usually turns to how a brand should sound. Warmer, more human, more relatable. It is a good instinct. But the longer I work across these two markets, the more I think we are solving for the wrong thing. Trust here is not something a brand can say its way into. It is something people go and check.

So we asked them. Between 13 and 16 June 2026, CARMA surveyed 337 consumers aged 20 to 39 across Singapore and Malaysia, screened by income, on what makes them trust a brand in beauty, luxury, hospitality and health and wellness. What came back was not what I expected.

Both markets name authenticity first. Forty-six per cent of respondents said they trust brands that feel authentic and relatable, ahead of brands endorsed by experts at 24 per cent, brands that are widely talked about at 16 per cent, and brands that feel aspirational and premium at 14 per cent. Singapore and Malaysia rank it identically, and the small difference between them on that measure is not statistically meaningful.

Then you ask whose word they would actually take, and the two markets turn in opposite directions.

In Singapore, 41 per cent rate customer-led content as the most credible format, against 20 per cent for expert-led. In Malaysia it inverts almost exactly: 41 percent expert-led, 28 per cent customer-led. Singapore looks sideways, to other customers who have already tried the thing. Malaysia looks up, to the person with the credentials.

Same value. Opposite messenger. That is why a single regional campaign built on authenticity tends to land in one of these markets and slide off the other.

‍

Proof outperformed influence in every category

The second finding is blunter. Across all four categories, the things that build trust are product quality, verified reviews and personal experience. Influencer recommendation ranked last in every one of them.

Among respondents interested in beauty, real customer results led at 42 per cent, with ingredient transparency second at 23 and influencer recommendation last at 6. Among those interested in luxury, quality led at 47 per cent, nearly three times prestige and status at 18. In hospitality, service quality led at 35 percent while influencers took 3. In health and wellness, proven results led at 35 per cent with medical expert credibility second at 24.

Asked which voices they trust most, 61 per cent named everyday consumers. Micro-influencers took 17 per cent. Celebrities and well-known people, 15.

None of that means influence has stopped working. It means influence is doing a different job than most plans assume. It gets a brand noticed. It is not what closes the decision.

‍

The channel that reaches an audience is not the one that persuades it

Social media is the most commonly named route to discovery, at 61 per cent, ahead of personal experience and word of mouth at 32, online reviews and ratings at 30, and expert opinion at 15. Respondents could name more than one, so these do not total 100.

Set that against what the same people say they find credible, where customer-led content leads at 35 per cent and expert-led at 30, and the two questions point indifferent directions. Visibility concentrates in one place. Credibility does not.

That gap is widening as discovery moves into AI-assisted search, where people ask questions in their own words and the answers come back assembled from sources no brand owns or controls.

‍

Two markets, two temperaments

Malaysian respondents registered consistently higher interest across all four categories. Singaporean respondents were more measured, wanting more evidence before committing interest.

Read along side the credibility finding, that points to two approaches rather than one. In Malaysia, momentum works: show up early, show up often, and put real results behind it. In Singapore, the quality of the evidence matters more than the quantity of the content.

The uncomfortable part of this research, for an agency, is that it argues against a good deal of what agencies sell. Reach is easier to buy than credibility, and considerably easier to report on. But the pattern holds across four categories and two markets. People are checking. And they are checking with each other, or with experts, rather than with brands.

In this region, reputation is not built by being everywhere. It is built by being right, and by being able to prove it.

‍

_{Survey conducted by CARMA between 13 and 16 June 2026. 337 respondents aged 20 to 39, 173 in Singapore and 164 in Malaysia, recruited by online self-completion panel and screened by monthly income above S$3,500 and RM3,000. Questionnaire in English in Singapore, and in English and Malay in Malaysia. No weighting applied. A screened, non-probability sample designed to reflect the income-qualified lifestyle audience in each market rather than the national population. Category questions were asked of respondents interested in each category, giving bases of 306 for health and wellness, 273 for beauty, 261 for hospitality and 243 for luxury.CARMA and Brazen are both part of News Group International.}